Thank you for this beautiful article (https://lnkd.in/eE64d_T8), but I do not agree with you at all.
I am afraid that artificial intelligence detection applications give 0% results for any product made by artificial intelligence applications such as Chat GPT, Bard, Bing Chat and other similar applications.
I myself tried these applications and found that their accuracy may be 0% because I produced a two-page text in GPT chat, and when I presented it to Turnitin to check the percentage of using artificial intelligence, I found it giving me a result of 0% for using artificial intelligence. While all the text was produced by artificial intelligence. Another very famous application was also used to examine these matters and presented it with the Bible and the American Constitution, and its result was more than 88% of the production of artificial intelligence.
Therefore, I have a completely different point of view than the one you mentioned in the article: In the event that the detection applications of artificial intelligence gave me 0%, this means that there is a very high possibility that this text was generated by artificial intelligence. But if the percentage is high in the use of artificial intelligence, then this means that there is a high quality of the text written by humans and not with the help of artificial intelligence. In reality, the matter is completely opposite.
Therefore, if you were my student and I had 0% of the use of artificial intelligence for the text that you prepared, then this makes me, as a responsible lecturer, assesst your assignment face to face with you, because this percentage gives me the impression that you used artificial intelligence applications in producing the text. As the current applications of artificial intelligence cannot in any way be detected by applications that detect the use of artificial intelligence such as Turnitin.
If you have another point of view, please provide it to me.
These are some sources that support my point of view. I very much appreciate what you presented and what you put forward through your point of view, and I look forward to more discussions on this topic with you:
The Influence of Flawed AI Detection Applications on Academic Integrity: https://lnkd.in/ecDJ28Ac
Artificial intelligence text detection applications are a very effective cheating tool for students use to cheat. A short practical story: https://lnkd.in/eHB2hg6f
Colleagues around the world, kindly avoid suggesting AI usage in student reports..: https://lnkd.in/eGFwHs7k
Thank you for this beautiful article (https://lnkd.in/eE64d_T8), but I do not agree with you at all.
I am afraid that artificial intelligence detection applications give 0% results for any product made by artificial intelligence applications such as Chat GPT, Bard, Bing Chat and other similar applications.
I myself tried these applications and found that their accuracy may be 0% because I produced a two-page text in GPT chat, and when I presented it to Turnitin to check the percentage of using artificial intelligence, I found it giving me a result of 0% for using artificial intelligence. While all the text was produced by artificial intelligence. Another very famous application was also used to examine these matters and presented it with the Bible and the American Constitution, and its result was more than 88% of the production of artificial intelligence.
Therefore, I have a completely different point of view than the one you mentioned in the article: In the event that the detection applications of artificial intelligence gave me 0%, this means that there is a very high possibility that this text was generated by artificial intelligence. But if the percentage is high in the use of artificial intelligence, then this means that there is a high quality of the text written by humans and not with the help of artificial intelligence. In reality, the matter is completely opposite.
Therefore, if you were my student and I had 0% of the use of artificial intelligence for the text that you prepared, then this makes me, as a responsible lecturer, assesst your assignment face to face with you, because this percentage gives me the impression that you used artificial intelligence applications in producing the text. As the current applications of artificial intelligence cannot in any way be detected by applications that detect the use of artificial intelligence such as Turnitin.
If you have another point of view, please provide it to me.
These are some sources that support my point of view. I very much appreciate what you presented and what you put forward through your point of view, and I look forward to more discussions on this topic with you:
How AI Detectors Mistakenly Identify AI as the Author of the Bible? https://lnkd.in/evmWDWwm
The Influence of Flawed AI Detection Applications on Academic Integrity: https://lnkd.in/ecDJ28Ac
Artificial intelligence text detection applications are a very effective cheating tool for students use to cheat. A short practical story: https://lnkd.in/eHB2hg6f
Colleagues around the world, kindly avoid suggesting AI usage in student reports..: https://lnkd.in/eGFwHs7k